1 | <easye> Ok. We start the abcl-1.1.0 "meeting" now. [21:00] |
---|
2 | ERC> /away herep. [21:01] |
---|
3 | *** You have been marked as being away |
---|
4 | ERC> /away herep. |
---|
5 | *** You have been marked as being away |
---|
6 | ERC> /away |
---|
7 | *** You are no longer marked as being away |
---|
8 | <easye> The format is informal: if anyone has some issue that hasn't been |
---|
9 | addressed properly, needs emphasis, etc. just speak up. [21:02] |
---|
10 | ERC> /topic abcl-1.1.0 release engineering (LIVE) [21:03] |
---|
11 | *** easye (~user@213.33.70.157) has set the topic for #abcl: "abcl-1.1.0 |
---|
12 | release engineering (LIVE)" |
---|
13 | <stassats> i want a pony! |
---|
14 | * easye has not had time to prepare adequately. |
---|
15 | <easye> Pink? |
---|
16 | <easye> My daughter has you covered. [21:04] |
---|
17 | <stassats> whatever color you have, i can paint it later |
---|
18 | * easye laughs. |
---|
19 | <easye> stassats: your contributions are greatly appreciated. |
---|
20 | <easye> You are our "bugs barbecue". [21:05] |
---|
21 | <stassats> i'm just trying to run things is all |
---|
22 | <easye> Yeah. I don't get enough time using ABCL as things pop up. |
---|
23 | <easye> It's amazing to me that we pass more of the ANSI test suite than SBCL, |
---|
24 | but have more nits that block actual use. [21:06] |
---|
25 | <easye> The one point I would like to "bug" my fellow committers is that we |
---|
26 | really need to start collecting tests for things we fix. |
---|
27 | <easye> One test looks stupid, but once one collects a couple hundred, one |
---|
28 | gets a quasi "emergent" intelligence. [21:07] |
---|
29 | <easye> Is this something we (I) could do to facilitate collecting and |
---|
30 | committing tests? [21:08] |
---|
31 | <easye> For instance, is the use of RT as the base of ABCL-TEST-LISP, which |
---|
32 | lacks "tear-up/tear-down" methods somehow a stumbling block? |
---|
33 | * stassats is brewing another bug-report [21:36] |
---|
34 | *** ehu` (~ehuels@31.137.220.19) has joined channel #abcl [21:49] |
---|
35 | *** ChanServ (ChanServ@services.) has changed mode for #abcl to +o ehu` |
---|
36 | <easye> ehu: re #211, closure-common loads for me. [21:51] |
---|
37 | <ehu`> ah. then we can close. [21:52] |
---|
38 | <ehu`> perfect. [21:53] |
---|
39 | <easye> New failure in running hunchentoot seemingly related to CLOS/MOP: |
---|
40 | http://trac.common-lisp.net/armedbear/ticket/198 |
---|
41 | <ehu`> hmm. [21:55] |
---|
42 | <ehu`> 198? |
---|
43 | <ehu`> that can't be new. |
---|
44 | <easye> It is a different error. |
---|
45 | <easye> But maybe not. I'll bisect. |
---|
46 | <easye> But not now. [21:56] |
---|
47 | <ehu`> sure. |
---|
48 | <easye> #198 looks like MOP::CHECK-INITARGS according to the stack trace. |
---|
49 | [21:57] |
---|
50 | <ehu`> that can't cause any new CLOS/MOP errors?!" |
---|
51 | <easye> We're closing the abcl-1.1.0 srum at 2200 EST: anything else that |
---|
52 | someone wishes to mention for the logs? |
---|
53 | <easye> ehu: can you run hunchentoot on trunk? [21:58] |
---|
54 | <ehu`> I can try. [21:59] |
---|
55 | <ehu`> but later tonight. |
---|
56 | <easye> Fine. |
---|
57 | <ehu`> did we do much better over the last week? [22:02] |
---|
58 | * easye hasn't had time to figure things out from a mathematical basis. |
---|
59 | [22:03] |
---|
60 | ERC> /topic Armed Bear Common Lisp / abcl-1.0.1 / abcl-1.1.0-dev issues |
---|
61 | *** easye (~user@213.33.70.157) has set the topic for #abcl: "Armed Bear |
---|
62 | Common Lisp / abcl-1.0.1 / abcl-1.1.0-dev issues" |
---|
63 | ERC> |
---|