Opened 13 years ago
Closed 4 years ago
#197 closed defect (fixed)
JAR-PATHNAME errors and ambiguities
| Reported by: | Mark Evenson | Owned by: | Mark Evenson |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | critical | Milestone: | 1.8.0 |
| Component: | interpreter | Version: | 1.0.1 |
| Keywords: | jar-pathname user-feedback | Cc: | |
| Parent Tickets: |
Description
Yong reports on armedbear@devel:
CL-USER> (make-pathname :device '("c:/a.b.jar")
:directory '(:absolute "cl-ppcre"))
; Evaluation aborted on NIL.
Why am I not getting any errors (and not dropping into a debugger)? I
know the error is because the device is not a list of a pathname ie
missing a #P.
- What's printed out is not what was read in (trailing /)
CL-USER> #P"jar:file:c:/a/b.jar!/cl-ppcre/" #P"jar:file:c:/a/b.jar!/cl-ppcre"
- Should this repeated jar:file:jar:file thing throw an error?
#P"jar:file:jar:file:c:/a/b.jar!/cl-ppcre/" ==> #P"jar:file:jar:file:c:/a/b.jar!/cl-ppcre"
Change History (18)
comment:1 Changed 13 years ago by
| Owner: | changed from ehuelsmann to Mark Evenson |
|---|---|
| Priority: | major → blocker |
| Status: | new → accepted |
comment:2 Changed 12 years ago by
| Keywords: | user-feedback added |
|---|---|
| Priority: | blocker → critical |
comment:3 Changed 12 years ago by
comment:4 Changed 12 years ago by
| Milestone: | 1.1.0 → 1.1.1 |
|---|
Some issues have been addressed.
In general, the Pathname stuff need to be rewritten in Lisp.
comment:5 Changed 12 years ago by
| Milestone: | 1.1.1 → 1.2.0 |
|---|
comment:6 Changed 11 years ago by
| Milestone: | 1.2.0 → 1.3.0 |
|---|
comment:9 Changed 11 years ago by
| Milestone: | 2.0.0 → 1.4.0 |
|---|
comment:14 Changed 4 years ago by
| Milestone: | 1.6.2 → 1.7.0 |
|---|
comment:18 Changed 4 years ago by
| Resolution: | → fixed |
|---|---|
| Status: | accepted → closed |
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
1) The only legal members of a DEVICE list are PATHNAMES.
You need to explicitly create a pathname via:
(make-pathname :device '(#p"c:/a.b.jar") :directory '(:absolute "cl-ppcre"))Agreed that an error would be a good idea.